 |
Psychology and Cum Links Sex
Especially before the development of dependable methods of contraception,the
control of cum links sexual behavior was of extreme practical importance to parents in some societies. The methodologies
employed by parents to try to prevent their children from prematurely becoming parents themselves could have a profound
effect on the minds of those children. In some societies, guilt was inculcated in an attempt to prevent premarital
cum links sexual activity, and the guilt could contaminate the entire self image of the individuals who, after all,
were biologically predetermined to have the "guilty" cum links sexual impulses that their families (and,
usually, their religions) were trying to head off. In other societies, shame was inculcated with the same goals
in mind and with analogous psychological damage possible. The
ability to function cum links sexually, especially for the male, depends a great deal on activities that occur not
in the cum links sexual organs but in the brain. When the individual has been psychologically traumatized by abusive
practices intended to control premarital cum links sexual activities, he or she may be unable to perform well even
after marriage has presumably legitimized cum links sexual intercourse. Dysfunctions for males may include: inability
to achieve an erection, penile insensitivity, premature ejaculation, etc. For the female they may include: "frigidity,"
inability to achieve orgasm, inability to permit intromission, etc. These problems may lead to secondary problems
if, for instance, affected individuals self medicate with alcohol, marijuana, or even more deleterious drugs. The
treatment of cum links sexual dysfunctions and the allied problems of low self esteem, guilt, self-destructive impulses,
etc., has been one of the main activities of helping professions such as psychiatry, clinical psychology, etc.
|
|
